Talk to an Agent today

Our qualified Hardenbergh Insurance Agents are online and ready to take your questions.

Required
Required
Required
Chat with us Live

New Jersey Broker Insurance

Choosing An Agent

Today’s competitive marketplace is forcing many businesses to examine both the prices they pay for their products/services and the companies that they buy them from. Insurance and risk management services are no exception. Traditionally, many midsize companies have held the belief that the best way to drive down costs is by conducting a bid process. Under this process, multiple Agents are invited to compete and submit bids for the company’s insurance. In today’s insurance marketplace, the bidding process is no longer the best way to achieve the best results.

Weaknesses in the Bid Approach

Pricing obtained through a bid process rarely represents the best the marketplace will offer

In today’s competitive market, underwriters don’t have time to give every account their best effort. They are forced to choose the new business opportunities they work on very carefully.
If an underwriter sees that more than one broker or Agent is shopping an account throughout the marketplace, they feel the chances of winning the business are slim and have little motivation to give the account their best effort.

Diminished Leverage in the Marketplace

Some buyers assign specific Agents to specific markets. While this does reduce market chaos to a certain degree, there are drawbacks to this approach. By assigning insurers, the buyer may not match the Agents with the markets with whom they have the strongest relationships and thus limit the ability to negotiate the best possible terms leveraging quotes against each other.

Increased Potential for Coverage Gaps or Deficiencies

When Agents are asked to bid, coverage is often compromised to reduce the price. All too often, it becomes the job of the client to then decipher the coverage gaps or deficiencies and makes it very difficult to then compare proposals on an apples-to apples basis.

Often the Focus Shifts from “Total Cost of Risk” to Premium

In a competitive bid situation, the underlying emphasis becomes bottom line premium cost. While it is important to consider the premium cost, it more important to understand and stay focused on the “total cost of risk”. “Total cost of risk” considers all those costs associated with a company’s insurance and risk management program. These expenses include smaller losses that fall below the company’s deductible or the lost productivity and retraining expense. Often, premium cost is only a percentage of a company’s total insurance cost. Many times, the lowest premium now will result in a higher total cost in the future.

How to Get the Best Results?

Businesses should look at the selection process in two steps. The first step is choosing the Agent and the second is picking the insurer. Some buyers may have concerns that the sequential approach slows and complicates the process. In fact, it streamlines the process. By selecting a Agent first, they handle much of the fact gathering, coordination and analysis that would normally fall to the buyer.

Choosing the right Agent

All Agents are not the same. To help obtain the best results for the company the buyer should develop an evaluation process to compare the potential Agents who are competing for the business. By doing this, the buyer will have the opportunity to focus on what each Agent can bring to the table and which one can best respond to the company’s needs.

Knowledge of the insured’s industry

Understanding of the client’s individual business

Rapport between the account team and the client

Quality and depth of personnel

Leverage in the marketplace

Program design and innovation

Scope of services provided

Quality of service

Relationship with Carriers

Willingness to be held accountable for results

Ability to communicate clearly and concisely

Cost of service

The Agent's responsibility is to:

Orchestrate the competition

Structure the proposal and evaluation process in a manner that facilitates an apples-to-apples comparison of Carriers

Make sure all markets receive the same information

Present the client’s business to insurers in the most effective way

Use their marketplace knowledge and relationships to negotiate the optimum terms and conditions from each Carrier

Provide additional insight on Carriers’ strengths and weaknesses and past performance.

Relationship with your Carrier

Underwriters are no different than any other service provider. They form relationships and devote greater resources to clients / prospects they know and trust. If a strong partnership exists, an organization will realize the benefit of that relationship— and likely more consistent insurance pricing. What's more, a long-term relationship encourages the insurance company to provide greater risk control consultation and better claim servicing.

Conclusion

Competition between Agents as well as insurance companies is a good thing for a company and an essential way for businesses to learn what is available in the marketplace. However, to gain the best competitive edge and the best value, a company must have properly managed the Agent competition. Once a Agent is selected, they can work with the buyer to conduct competition amongst the Carriers.